Summary
Curefoods Case Study explores the rise of one of India’s fastest‑growing foodtech startups and a defining example of the cloud kitchen model in India. Founded in 2020 by former Flipkart executive Ankit Nagori, Curefoods operates a network of multi‑brand, delivery‑only kitchens across the country, building a suite of virtual food brands and scaling through acquisitions and strategic partnerships. The company is headquartered in Bengaluru, where it has anchored both its operational infrastructure and strategic growth plans. The idea was born against the backdrop of a rapidly expanding digital food delivery market, accelerated by pandemic‑era shifts in consumer behaviour. Nagori and his team recognised that multi‑brand cloud kitchen networks could drive efficiency and brand diversification far more effectively than single‑brand cloud kitchens. Instead of owning dine‑in restaurants, Curefoods focused on delivery‑only kitchens that prepare a range of cuisines under distinct brand identities, distributed across urban and emerging cities.
Curefoods works by incubating, acquiring, and operating a portfolio of virtual food brands, from healthy meal plans under EatFit to desserts and speciality offerings like CakeZone, Nomad Pizza, and Sharief Bhai Biryani. It leases or operates kitchen space where multiple brands are prepared, reducing overhead and improving unit economics compared to traditional restaurants. As the company expanded, it also invested in strategic acquisitions, adding brands, operations, and geographic depth.
Financially, Curefoods has raised multiple rounds from marquee investors including Three State Ventures (Binny Bansal’s fund), Iron Pillar, Chiratae Ventures, Accel, Sixteenth Street Capital and others, with total disclosed funding crossing $155 million and additional debt, and the company has filed DRHP for an IPO to raise ₹800 crore. This case study delves into Curefoods’ origins, product evolution, business model, funding journey, competitive landscape, key challenges, operational decisions, growth milestones, leadership strategy, and future roadmap—painting a comprehensive picture of how a cloud kitchen startup carved out a sizeable footprint in India’s food ecosystem.
2. The Origin Story: How Curefoods Began
Curefoods’ story starts with Ankit Nagori, an entrepreneur deeply entrenched in India’s tech and wellness startup ecosystem. Before Curefoods, Nagori was a pioneer at Flipkart, rising to Chief Business Officer, and later co‑founded wellness startup Curefit with Myntra founder Mukesh Bansal. After years in consumer‑facing tech and wellness, Nagori turned his attention to food delivery—an area that was rapidly transforming due to changing lifestyles and the rise of on‑demand platforms like Zomato and Swiggy.
In 2020, amidst the Covid‑19 pandemic, he recognised a fresh opportunity: while restaurants struggled with footfall restrictions and uncertainties, cloud kitchens—commercial facilities dedicated exclusively to delivery‑only food—were gaining traction. Nagori saw potential not just in building another cloud kitchen, but in creating a multi‑brand network that could incubate and scale food brands at national scale with technology‑enabled efficiency.
The foundational idea was to create a “house of brands” rather than a single food label. This meant incubating nutrition‑centric menus, pairing emerging local favourites with operational expertise, and using shared kitchen infrastructure to lower costs and increase output. The vision was clear: replace individual restaurants’ high fixed costs with centralised preparation hubs capable of servicing multiple delivery brands.
Nagori’s experience in tech‑driven marketplaces, combined with deep operational insight from Curefit, helped shape this approach. Curefoods was crafted as a hybrid between tech platform thinking and foodservice expertise—an approach that would prove central to its early differentiation in a crowded cloud kitchen market.
3. The Founder Journey, Motivation, and Early Struggles
Before Curefoods, Nagori had already seen the power of digital platforms to transform everyday consumer behaviour. But food was different. Unlike clothes or fitness classes, food is consumed daily—and quality expectations are immediate and unforgiving. Nagori faced early questions about whether a cloud kitchen could sustain repeat demand without the brand loyalty and experiential edge of dine‑in restaurants.
His early motivation was less about creating another food delivery service and more about reimagining how food brands could scale digitally, avoiding traditional restaurant pitfalls like high rental costs, staffing challenges, and inconsistent customer experiences. The ambition was to apply a tech‑first mindset to a fundamentally operational business.
Early struggles included aligning food brands to a centralised operational process while retaining their unique identities, navigating supply‑chain challenges exacerbated by pandemic disruptions, and convincing investors that an asset‑light food portfolio could be more profitable than standalone restaurants in the long term. These operational and perception challenges set the stage for the strategies Curefoods would adopt in the years ahead.
4. Identifying the Problem in the Market
India’s food delivery market was growing rapidly prior to Curefoods’ inception, but it was also highly fragmented. Traditional restaurants adapted their dine‑in menus for delivery, but struggled with capacity utilisation and profitability due to high fixed costs and inconsistent delivery experiences. Many restaurants lacked the operational maturity to manage delivery logistics, quality control, or customer engagement at scale. Consumers, meanwhile, were becoming increasingly comfortable ordering food online—but often faced high prices, long delivery times, and inconsistent quality due to these operational bottlenecks. Marketpendence on third‑party delivery platforms like Zomato and Swiggy provided reach, but not predictable economics for restaurants.
The problem Curefoods identified was twofold: the inefficiency of traditional restaurant delivery and the absence of scalable, brand‑driven cloud kitchen networks that could operate multiple cuisines with consistent quality and faster delivery. By building multi‑brand cloud kitchen networks, Curefoods aimed to improve unit economics for food brands while elevating customer experience across menus and delivery promises.
5. Building the Service: Structure and Evolution
Curefoods started by incubating a set of food concepts designed for delivery first. Instead of focusing on a single brand, the startup incubated and acquired multiple concepts that could be prepared from shared kitchen space. Its portfolio included diverse offerings: healthy meals under EatFit, pizzas under Nomad Pizza, desserts under CakeZone, traditional Indian meals under Sharief Bhai Biryani, and more. The multi‑brand kitchen model allowed Curefoods to produce different cuisines from the same physical infrastructure, increasing kitchen utilisation and lowering per‑brand cost. This approach combined operational rigor, menu engineering, and shared technology systems to track orders, quality, and delivery performance.
Curefoods also pursued a brand acquisition strategy. Over time, it acquired local and high‑potential cloud brands, including buying stakes in Yumlane Pizza and incorporating Maverix—bringing their brands under Curefoods’ umbrella and expanding geographical presence. These acquisitions allowed Curefoods to absorb proven menus, regional customer loyalty, and operational systems into its platform.
As the business evolved, the company invested in centralised food factories to prepare base components and distribute them to cloud kitchen locations, further standardising quality and enabling scale. The tech stack became another backbone—integrating with delivery partners, internal logistics, and brand performance dashboards to optimise fulfilment in real time.
6. Early Traction and Validation Phase
Curefoods found its footing not through hype or aggressive marketing, but through the steady rhythm of kitchens turning out meals people genuinely wanted. By early 2023, the company had already crossed 150 cloud kitchens across 15 cities, a scale few in the Indian food-tech space had managed with such consistency. Tens of thousands of orders flowed in every day, and the month they crossed 1.1 million monthly orders became a quiet confirmation that the model worked. These weren’t vanity numbers. They reflected a deep behavioural shift—consumers were growing comfortable trusting delivery-first brands for everyday meals, celebrations, and spontaneous cravings.
The traction wasn’t confined to a single category. EatFit brought in a steady base of health-focused, repeat users who relied on the brand like a daily companion. CakeZone carried emotional weight, supplying birthday moments, festival treats, and last-minute surprises across cities. Acquisitions like Nomad Pizza and Sharief Bhai added personality and range, giving the portfolio a cultural and culinary breadth that felt organic rather than forced.
The real breakthrough was outside the metros. Tier-II and Tier-III cities responded with enthusiasm, disproving the long-held belief that cloud kitchens thrived only in dense urban pockets. When repeat orders began rising in cities where traditional dine-in restaurants still dominated, it gave Curefoods one of its strongest validation signals. Investors watched that expansion closely. Operators across the industry took note. It was proof that India’s appetite for delivery-first brands was deeper and more geographically diverse than anyone expected.
7. Business Model and Revenue Approach
Curefoods built its revenue engine on a layered model that balanced scale, diversity, and operational discipline. At the core sits direct revenue from cloud kitchens. Every order placed through Zomato, Swiggy, or the company’s own channels contributes to the top line. But Curefoods didn’t limit itself to the standard marketplace-driven playbook. It supplemented delivery revenue with franchise partnerships, brand licensing, and recurring subscription income—especially through EatFit’s meal plans, which created predictable monthly inflows and high customer stickiness.
The architecture of the business is where its real strength lies. A multi-brand kitchen can prepare biryani, pizza, salads, and desserts under one roof. The same equipment. The same crew. Same real estate. This shared infrastructure drastically reduces the marginal cost of running each brand and allows Curefoods to enter new cuisines with far lower capital burn.
Centralised production units bring another layer of efficiency. Ingredients move through a controlled pipeline, ensuring consistent taste and reducing wastage. For a business where margins are measured in small percentages, that level of control is the difference between survival and profitability.
Brand acquisitions add a strategic advantage. Instead of building every concept from the ground up, Curefoods acquires brands with proven demand and integrates them into its kitchen network. This approach compresses the usual time it takes to test, scale, and stabilise a new offering. The result is a revenue mix that feels balanced—high-volume staples, celebratory desserts, premium cuisines, and health-forward subscriptions all working together to smooth seasonal or category-specific drops.
8. Funding History and Investor Involvement
Curefoods’ rise has been fueled by deliberate and well-timed investment. In the early days, capital flowed into building high-quality kitchens and developing the tech infrastructure that underpins order routing, supply chain visibility, and kitchen efficiency. As the brand matured, the funding narrative shifted toward consolidation and scale.
A major turning point came with the $62 million round led by Iron Pillar and Binny Bansal’s fund. That infusion didn’t just increase runway—it validated the idea that a multi-brand cloud kitchen ecosystem could become a category-defining business. It allowed Curefoods to accelerate acquisitions, upgrade production facilities, and deepen its presence in emerging cities.
By 2024, the company raised another $25 million from Bansal’s Three State Ventures as part of Series D, pushing total funding to about $155 million and valuing the company at roughly $375 million. These weren’t passive bets. Investors saw strong unit economics in several micro-markets, improving brand loyalty, and a clear roadmap toward profitability. The pre-IPO round of ₹160 crore, again led by 3State Ventures, carried a different symbolism. It signaled that Curefoods wasn’t just scaling; it was maturing. Public market expectations demand discipline—cleaner financials, stronger governance, and predictable growth. The company’s ability to attract capital at that stage showed investor confidence not only in its current trajectory but in its long-term readiness for the public markets.
Strategic debt also played a role. Rather than relying solely on equity, Curefoods used debt to fund equipment and expand operational capacity. This balanced capital structure positions the company well as it moves toward life as a listed entity—disciplined, diversified, and built on foundations strong enough to handle the demands of scale..
9. Go-to-Market and Distribution Strategy
Curefoods did not stumble into scale; it engineered it. The company approached its go-to-market strategy with a level of precision usually reserved for large FMCG brands. From the outset, the goal was simple but ambitious: create presence everywhere consumers made food decisions, without the overhead of traditional restaurant formats.
Cloud kitchens allowed Curefoods to spread rapidly, dropping operationally light footprints across cities while preserving the freedom to experiment with menus and revenue channels. The partnership with delivery aggregators like Zomato and Swiggy acted as an early accelerator. These platforms supplied the visibility and discovery juice that new brands desperately need. But Curefoods didn’t stop at being an aggregator-dependent brand.
As orders scaled and patterns became predictable, the company began investing in direct ordering channels—its website, mobile apps, and even a selectively built in-house delivery fleet. Direct orders improved margins, but more importantly, they deepened the company’s relationships with loyal customers who discovered value in subscription meals, healthier menus, and predictable taste. The cross-selling advantage of a multi-brand portfolio became a subtle but powerful growth lever. Someone ordering a pizza from Nomad could be nudged toward CakeZone for dessert, or a health-conscious user on EatFit might stumble upon a comfort food option for weekends. One kitchen, multiple audience segments, and a customer lifetime value that kept improving with every new brand under the umbrella.
The expansion into offline kiosks and compact QSR outlets marked the next stage of evolution. These weren’t full-service formats but smart touchpoints—airport kiosks, mall counters, office park setups—designed to enhance visibility and trust. For a delivery-first business, physical presence works like a brand handshake. Customers see the name, smell the food, watch the preparation, and trust the brand even more when they order online later. Curefoods blended both worlds—digital scale and selective physical presence—to create a distribution model that felt modern yet grounded.
10. Brand Positioning and Messaging Evolution
When Curefoods first stepped into the market, it played the role of a cloud kitchen aggregator. The messaging was functional and straightforward: reliable food, reasonable prices, and good variety. But as the catalogue deepened and the business matured, the company recognized that it wasn’t just delivering meals. It was curating culinary identities.
Cloud kitchen aggregator slowly transformed into “house of food brands,” a phrase that captured ambition, scale, and narrative in one stroke. EatFit offered the discipline of healthy eating. CakeZone carried emotion. Nomad served indulgence. Sharief Bhai celebrated heritage. Each brand began speaking in its own voice while still belonging to the same family—much like how a media house runs different channels for different audiences.
This shift wasn’t just about marketing; it was about letting consumers understand the company’s soul. It wasn’t trying to be everything to everyone. Instead, Curefoods built a mosaic of experiences—each brand built around strong culinary archetypes but stitched together with a promise of consistent quality and operational excellence. By leaning into local cuisines while nurturing contemporary food concepts, Curefoods allowed its messaging to evolve organically. It could celebrate diversity without diluting brand identity. The story became richer, the customer touchpoints more meaningful, and the brand perception shifted from a delivery convenience to a trusted curator of everyday eating.
11. Key Challenges, Failures, and Turning Points
Operating in the cloud kitchen space means competing in a battlefield where speed, consistency, and margins collide every day. Curefoods walked into a sector already buzzing with giants like Rebel Foods, Biryani By Kilo, and a wave of regional contenders. Staying ahead required more than capital. It demanded discipline and relentless adaptability.
The company struggled in its early days with the operational complexity of managing inventory across dozens of kitchens. Quality dips—inevitable when scaling rapidly—had to be addressed with rigorous training programs, standardised recipes, and investments in tech-enabled kitchen monitoring. Delivery partner commissions, which often eat into margins, forced Curefoods to push its direct ordering ecosystem harder.
Yet, within these challenges lay hidden turning points. When the pandemic normalised online food delivery across India, Curefoods was already positioned to ride the wave. Kitchens that were still finding their footing suddenly found themselves at the centre of a national behaviour shift. What was once considered a convenience became a necessity. That period accelerated consumer trust in delivery-first models like never before. Strategic acquisitions became another turning point. The Maverix acquisition and expanded rights to Yumlane pizza strengthened its hold in categories that had strong repeat demand. Each acquisition added a new chapter to Curefoods’ portfolio story, reducing the time and cost required to launch new brands from scratch.
However, geographic expansion proved to be its most complex challenge. Scaling across multiple cities meant building regional central kitchens, developing SOPs that worked anywhere, and training teams with near military precision. Curefoods solved these problems not overnight but through years of iteration—tightening supply chains, building better dashboards, and empowering regional teams with decision-making autonomy. Every challenge forced maturity. Every turning point strengthened the foundation. And the company that emerged wasn’t just a cloud kitchen operator—it became one of India’s most deliberate and disciplined food brand houses.
12. Operational Execution and Scaling Decisions
Curefoods learned early that speed matters just as much as taste. Instead of sinking capital into lavish dine-in spaces, the team doubled down on an asset-light approach. Kitchens were leased, not owned. Spaces were compact, efficient, and built for output rather than ambience. This helped the company avoid the burden of heavy real-estate investment while preserving flexibility to enter, exit, or expand in a city at the pace that demand required.
The real unlock came from its centralised manufacturing hubs. These units weren’t just production facilities. They functioned like the beating heart of the organisation. Base sauces, par-cooked components, signature batters, dessert mixes, and gravies were all standardised and shipped out daily. This tightened quality control and kept flavours consistent across cities. It also shortened order preparation time inside kitchens, which boosted delivery speed.
Scaling, though, didn’t only rely on kitchens. Curefoods built layers of technology behind the scenes. Real-time dashboards tracked kitchen loads and flagged delays in minutes. AI-assisted routing nudged orders to under-utilised kitchens nearby. Quality audits became digital, allowing teams to catch minor issues before they became systemic. These decisions allowed Curefoods to multiply its footprint without multiplying its managerial load, a sign of a maturing food-tech operation.
13. Competitive Landscape and Differentiation
The cloud kitchen market is unforgiving. Rebel Foods commands brand recall and global presence. Biryani By Kilo has a strong identity anchored in a single category. Regional players fight fiercely over hyperlocal loyalty. Curefoods stepped into this arena knowing that it couldn’t win by outspending everyone. It needed to out-strategise instead.
Its biggest differentiator became its appetite for acquiring and scaling promising brands rather than building everything in-house. When it acquired Nomad Pizza, it didn’t just buy a menu. It bought a culture of craft pizza making and brought it into a system that could scale it nationwide. Sharief Bhai brought legacy flavours from Bengaluru’s Muslim cuisine. Yumlane offered a frozen-to-fresh pizza model that meshed perfectly with delivery.
This ability to stitch together a quilt of diverse brands under one operational philosophy set Curefoods apart. The portfolio covered wholesome meals, indulgent desserts, regional favourites, and fast food. Customers didn’t just see Curefoods as a delivery brand. They experienced it as a menu that mirrored their moods and daily cravings. The brand also explored a hybrid world where online kitchens sat alongside kiosks and quick-service counters. This gave it physical visibility and a touchpoint for impulse purchases, something pure cloud kitchen players often lacked.
14. Growth Metrics, Milestones, and Achievements
The numbers tell a story of intensity and ambition. In its first few years, Curefoods scaled from a handful of kitchens to more than 200 across 15 cities. Daily order volumes climbed from thousands to tens of thousands as its brands found traction across metros and emerging cities. It’s unusual for a food brand to move this fast while managing such diverse cuisine types, which made the achievement more significant.
By FY23, the company crossed INR 384 crore in revenue. For a business still in expansion mode, this showed clear market acceptance and strong brand equity. Alongside this, Curefoods continued to build investor confidence. Its Series D funding, pre-IPO placements, and structured debt raised signaled that financial backers saw a long-term business with room to grow rather than a short-cycle food trend.
The decision to pursue an IPO and target around ₹800 crore marked another turning point. Preparing for public markets forces discipline. It demands clarity in operations, reporting, and governance. Curefoods’ regulatory progress shows that it has moved beyond the scrappy startup phase and is stepping into a more institutional identity. Seen as a whole, Curefoods’ story blends operational resilience, a portfolio strategy built on cultural insight, and a willingness to evolve fast. It’s still writing its next chapters, but the foundation is strong and the ambition unmistakable.
15. Team Building and Leadership Approach
From the start, Ankit Nagori understood that food delivery is a balancing act between high-pressure digital expectations and the gritty reality of kitchen operations. He built the team with this duality in mind. Instead of hiring only tech specialists or only chefs and operations managers, Curefoods brought in people who understood the rhythm of both worlds. Former restaurant operators worked alongside data analysts. Supply-chain veterans worked with product managers who had scaled consumer apps. This blend helped Curefoods build a culture where decisions were grounded in real-world constraints as well as digital ambition.
Teams were organised with intention. Each brand vertical had leaders who could nurture its identity, while geographic clusters ensured tight control over regional performance. Supply functions operated almost like an internal backbone, supporting every other vertical. This structure created clarity and accountability. People knew what they owned, and leaders knew exactly where bottlenecks or breakthroughs were happening.
But the real strength came from cross-functional collaboration. Marketing didn’t launch a campaign without checking kitchen capacity. Culinary teams didn’t introduce a new dish without looping in procurement. Logistics leaders worked hand in hand with tech teams to make delivery smoother. This cohesion humanised the entire organisation. It felt less like a set of departments and more like a living system where each part responded to the others. In a business where a small operational misstep can ruin a customer experience, this approach made a measurable difference.
16. Technology, Operations, and Supply Chain Insights
Behind the brand names and the menus, Curefoods functions like a precision-engineered operations machine. Technology doesn’t just support the business; it shapes how the business breathes. Real-time routing ensures that orders go to the kitchen best equipped to handle them. This reduces delays and keeps kitchen staff from getting overwhelmed during peak demand. Inventory forecasting tools anticipate what each kitchen will need before shortages appear. These tools prevent waste, protect margins, and keep dishes consistent from one location to another.
On the operations side, central food factories deliver a huge advantage. They allow Curefoods to control core ingredients, maintain uniform quality, and manage costs at scale. Instead of dozens of kitchens procuring and preparing ingredients independently, the factories send out ready-to-use components daily. This reduces labour costs in individual kitchens, speeds up preparation time, and ensures every order meets the same flavour benchmark.
The supply chain was built to respect geography as much as efficiency. Regional hubs cut down on travel time for fresh ingredients, ensuring food quality isn’t compromised by long-haul logistics. Over time, this network became one of Curefoods’ biggest strengths—lean, responsive, and built with the understanding that food, more than anything, depends on timing and freshness.
17. Regulatory and Industry-Specific Hurdles
Scaling a food business in India means embracing a maze of regulations. Each kitchen needs multiple licenses. Each city comes with its own compliance landscape. Curefoods had to develop a strong internal compliance framework simply to keep pace with the speed at which it was expanding. Food safety audits became routine. Hygiene standards were monitored through digital checklists and surprise inspections. The company understood that one misstep could erode trust built over years.
As Curefoods expanded into offline counters and gained rights for marquee brands like Krispy Kreme, the regulatory stakes rose even higher. Retail food businesses come with additional layers of compliance—store layout approvals, staff training certifications, equipment standards, and franchise-specific guidelines. This required Curefoods to shift from thinking like a digital food company to thinking like a full-stack food organisation with responsibilities across retail, franchise operations, and manufacturing.
Despite these hurdles, Curefoods managed to maintain pace by building a compliance function that worked closely with operations, not over it. Teams approached regulatory work as part of the craft, not a necessary nuisance. This mindset helped the company move quickly without cutting corners, an approach that will matter even more as it moves toward public markets. These sections reflect a company that didn’t just scale. It learned, adapted, and built systems that respect both ambition and the everyday demands of feeding millions.
18. Current Status of the Startup
By 2025, Curefoods sits at a very different place from where it began. The company is now weaving Krispy Kreme’s pan-India rollout into its expanding ecosystem, a move that signals both ambition and capability. Managing a global brand with strict operational playbooks is a test few Indian foodtech companies have passed, yet Curefoods is doing it while growing its own network of cloud kitchens and offline kiosks. This dual play—scaling owned brands while operating a beloved international one—shows that the company is no longer experimenting. It is executing with discipline.
Revenues continue to rise, supported by a sharper focus on unit economics. Kitchens that once struggled with utilisation now benefit from refined forecasting models and improved cross-brand menu planning. The financial profile is maturing, and that maturity is visible in the company’s IPO preparations. Regulatory filings, investor interest, and pre-IPO placements all point toward a business that has moved from scrappy expansion to structured growth. Curefoods today resembles a company that knows where it’s going and is finally operating with the confidence of scale.
Future Outlook
The Curefoods journey offers a clear window into what the next decade of India’s foodtech sector may become. Virtual brands are no longer an experiment—they are a mainstream consumption format. Consumers don’t think twice before ordering from brands they’ve never seen in a physical store. This shift benefits companies like Curefoods, whose operational backbone allows them to launch, test, and scale concepts faster than traditional restaurant chains ever could.
But the future won’t be online-only. Curefoods’ expansion into kiosks and retail venues signals a quiet convergence. The most successful food brands will exist in two worlds at once: the digital storefront built on convenience and the physical touchpoint built on familiarity. For a company that grew out of cloud kitchens, this blending of offline and online is more than strategy—it’s an evolution shaped by consumer behaviour and grounded in operational learning.
The planned IPO will likely accelerate its next chapter. With capital to fuel acquisitions and new brand incubation, Curefoods could deepen its presence in tier-II and tier-III markets where demand is rising but supply remains fragmented. Strengthening direct-to-consumer channels will help reduce dependency on aggregators, improving margins and customer ownership. Meanwhile, more advanced tech integrations—in forecasting, logistics, and kitchen automation—will determine how efficiently the company scales from here. Curefoods’ story shows how foodtech can grow quickly in a country where food is deeply personal, culturally layered, and ever in demand. It’s a reminder that in India’s food ecosystem, success comes from understanding both the emotional connection people have with their meals and the operational muscle required to deliver those meals consistently at scale.
About foundlanes.com
foundlanes.com is India’s leading startup idea and deep-dive platform built for founders, operators, and serious entrepreneurs. We go beyond surface-level advice to deliver grounded, research-backed, and experience-driven startup content.
Every guide on foundlanes.com is designed to help readers think clearly, act strategically, and build sustainably. This cloud kitchen startup guide is part of our mission to document real business pathways in India’s evolving startup ecosystem.